Freedom of Expression or Freedom to Blaspheme?
FREEDOM of expression must not be confused with freedom from the
consequences of expression. Exercising freedom and abusing it are not
the same. The latter forfeits the former. Just because we are free to
express ourselves, it doesn’t free us from the responsibility for what
we express. We are responsible for what we say and do and for the
consequences thereof and so must consider carefully what we want to
express. This is the basis of what we call civilized socially
responsible behavior.
Once again we have an attack on the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon
him) on whom it seems to be open season all the year round for people to
take pot shots. And then cry foul when those who love him get upset.
The rule seems to be, ‘I will say or do whatever I want but you must not
get offended.’ Another rule, ‘Prove your maturity and culture by not
being offended by insults.’
Seems strange indeed to us who are brought up in a culture where
honor is not just important, it is everything. Respect for our signs and
symbols is what our sense of honor is based on. And there is no symbol
of our honor other than Allah Himself, that is more important than the
Prophet (Peace be on him). So if someone insults him, it is very natural
for a Muslim to feel sad and very mad. The claim of those who make
these attacks is, ‘But we are not offended when someone blasphemes
against Jesus or Moses. So how can you be offended when we insult
Mohammed (Peace be on them all)?’ That is like saying, ‘I am not
offended if you curse my parents and so you should also not be offended
if I curse your parents.’
Our response is of course, ‘We have never cursed your parents in the
first place. And secondly if you are not offended if someone curses
your parents it is a sign that you are lacking in a sense of honor. That
you are shameless. How can you demand that we also become shameless?’
For the record, find me a film made by a Muslim which abuses Jesus or
Moses? You won’t find it because we revere them as prophets of Allah. So
when Muslims have not done anything to abuse Christianity or Judaism,
why should they be subjected to abuse from Christians and Jews (the
people who allegedly made this ridiculous film) and be compelled to
accept it?
I am not for a moment justifying or countenancing the violent
protests and the unfortunate killing of innocent people. I have already
spoken against that on several occasions since it happened. However I am
writing this to request all responsible people to seriously wake up and
start asking some pointed questions. One of which should be, ‘What was
the need for this film in the first place? What is wrong with letting
people believe whatever they want? What is wrong with leaving people
alone with their religions – which is a basic human right?’
Why must people be forced to tolerate insults? Why must people be
forced to sacrifice their honor just because those who have no honor
want to exercise their fancy? Is this fair? Is anyone interested in
justice anymore?
If we go by this logic then the right to safety and security must be
balanced by the right to terrorize a population. The right to education
must be balanced by the right to remain ignorant. The right to health
must be balanced by the right to sickness. The right to marriage must be
balanced by the right to rape and so on. Crazy, isn’t it? Just as crazy
as the call that the right to freedom of religion must be balanced by
the right to blaspheme any religion. These people want to impose the
rule on us that if the followers of any religion want to practice their
religion then they must be prepared to accept the fact that all that
they hold holy and sacred will be blasphemed, insulted, degraded and
desecrated by other people who don’t care about their feelings and they
must accept this treatment without complaint.
Doesn’t that sound like a gross violation of human rights? It does,
to me. Violence to human rights is not only physical violence. It is
also violence that is psychological and mental. Ask any divorce lawyer
who is suing on the basis of mental torture. This is an accepted
principal in law. Freedom is defined as something that you are permitted
to do as long as it does not violate someone else’s freedom; does not
hurt someone else; does not harm anyone else. That is why the famous
saying, “Your freedom ends where my nose begins.” If we define freedom
as the unbridled right of someone to do whatever he or she wants
irrespective of what harm this action or speech may do to someone else’s
dignity, reputation, relationships or position, then we would have
complete chaos and anarchy.
Defined in the way the makers of this ridiculous film and their
supporters are demanding, freedom of speech must be rechristened
‘freedom to abuse’, ‘freedom to hurt’, ‘freedom to damage’, freedom to
destroy’. This is a completely senseless argument and this behavior is
not civilized at all. It is barbarism and oppression at its worst. So
what is so different when it is done by film makers with the target
being not one man or woman but an entire population? If anything it must
make the crime humungous in magnitude.
In my view it is important for people of all religions to come
together and stand together to ensure that freedom of worship and
freedom of expression is ensured for everyone. And that this is done
with an understanding of responsibility for expression. There can be no
freedom of worship or expression when some people insult and abuse what
someone else worships or reveres. Insulting someone personally is not
accepted as a freedom in any civilized society. If someone did that they
would become liable for legal action and punishment. So how can it be
accepted to insult someone or something that an individual worships or
considers holy?
Will someone explain this insanity to me please??
Mirza Yawar Baig in Saudi Life. Here
No comments:
Post a Comment