Pages

Wednesday, June 08, 2011

SIO delegates greet M H Jawahirullah MLA


மனித நேய மக்கள் கட்சித் தலைவர் பேரா.M.H.ஜவாஹிருல்லாஹ் MLA அவர்களை, இந்திய மாணவர் இஸ்லாமிய அமைப்பு (SIO) மாநில செயலாளர் M.சையது அபுதாஹிர் M.Sc., M.Phil தலைமையில், மாநில மக்கள் தொடர்பு செயலாளர் M.S. சப்பீர் அலி MBA, மாநில ஜூனியர் அபிமானிகள் வட்ட பொறுப்பாளர் S.சேக் இஸ்மாயில் M.Sc ஆகியோரைக் கொண்ட உயர்நிலைக் குழுவினர் சந்தித்து, நடந்து முடிந்த சட்ட மன்ற தேர்தலில் வெற்றி பெற்றதற்காக SIO-ன் வாழ்த்துக்களைத் தெரிவித்தனர். மாணவர் கோரிக்கையையும் வழங்கினர்.
இச்சந்திப்பின் போது, இந்திய மாணவர் இஸ்லாமிய அமைப்பு (SIO) செய்து வரும் மாணவர் நலப்பணிகள் குறித்து எடுத்துரைக்கப்பட்ட்து. மேலும் தமிழகத்தின் கல்வி சூழ்நிலைகள் குறித்து விரிவாக விவாதிக்கப்பட்டது. கல்வி இன்று வியாபார நோக்கில் செயல்படுவதை தடுக்கவும், தனியார் மயமாக்கப்படுகின்ற கல்வித்துறையின் போக்கினை மாற்றிடவும், பாலியல் கல்வித்திட்ட்த்தை ரத்து செய்திடவும், அனைத்து வகுப்புகளுக்கும் ஒழுக்க பாடத்திட்ட்த்தை கொண்டு வருவதற்கான முழு முயற்சியினை சட்ட மன்றத்தில் பதிவு செய்ய வேண்டும் எனவும் (SIO) -ன் சார்பில் கோரிக்கைகள் வைக்கப்பட்ட்து.
இச்சந்திப்பின் போது மாணவர்கள் அறிக்கையை மாநில செயலாளர் சகோ. சையது அபுதாஹிர் அவர்களும், நினைவுப் பரிசினை மாநில மக்கள் தொடர்பு செயலாளர் சகோ.சப்பீர் அலி அவர்களும் பேரா.M.H.ஜவாஹிருல்லாஹ் MLA அவர்களுக்கு வழங்கினர். 
A report in SIO Tamil Nadu Zone. Here

"Can the hungry go on a hunger strike?": Arundhati Roy

I want to talk more about Mary Roy – and eventually we do – but there's one important point to clear up first. Guerrillas use violence, generally directed against the police and army, but sometimes causing injury and death to civilians caught in the crossfire. 

Does she condemn that violence? "I don't condemn it any more," she says. "If you're an adivasi [tribal Indian] living in a forest village and 800 CRP [Central Reserve Police] come and surround your village and start burning it, what are you supposed to do? Are you supposed to go on hunger strike?"

"Can the hungry go on a hunger strike? Non-violence is a piece of theatre. You need an audience. What can you do when you have no audience? People have the right to resist annihilation."
Arundhati Roy in conversation with Stephen Moss in Guardian. Here

When I began to make friends, writing was the vehicle: Jhumpa Lahiri

Books, and the stories they contained, were the only things I felt I was able to possess as a child. Even then, the possession was not literal; my father is a librarian, and perhaps because he believed in collective property, or perhaps because my parents considered buying books for me an extravagance, or perhaps because people generally acquired less then than they do now, I had almost no books to call my own. I remember coveting and eventually being permitted to own a book for the first time. I was five or six. The book was diminutive, about four inches square, and was called “You’ll Never Have to Look for Friends.” It lived among the penny candy and the Wacky Packs at the old-fashioned general store across the street from our first house in Rhode Island. The plot was trite, more an extended greeting card than a story. But I remember the excitement of watching my mother purchase it for me and of bringing it home. Inside the front cover, beneath the declaration “This book is especially for,” was a line on which to write my name. My mother did so, and also wrote the word “mother” to indicate that the book had been given to me by her, though I did not call her Mother but Ma. “Mother” was an alternate guardian. But she had given me a book that, nearly forty years later, still dwells on a bookcase in my childhood room.

Our house was not devoid of things to read, but the offerings felt scant, and were of little interest to me. There were books about China and Russia that my father read for his graduate studies in political science, and issues of Time that he read to relax. My mother owned novels and short stories and stacks of a literary magazine called Desh, but they were in Bengali, even the titles illegible to me. She kept her reading material on metal shelves in the basement, or off limits by her bedside. I remember a yellow volume of lyrics by the poet Kazi Nazrul Islam, which seemed to be a holy text to her, and a thick, fraying English dictionary with a maroon cover that was pulled out for Scrabble games. At one point, we bought the first few volumes of a set of encyclopedias that the supermarket where we shopped was promoting, but we never got them all. There was an arbitrary, haphazard quality to the books in our house, as there was to certain other aspects of our material lives. I craved the opposite: a house where books were a solid presence, piled on every surface and cheerfully lining the walls. At times, my family’s effort to fill our house with books seemed thwarted; this was the case when my father mounted rods and brackets to hold a set of olive-green shelves. Within a few days the shelves collapsed, the Sheetrocked walls of our seventies-era Colonial unable to support them.

When I began to make friends, writing was the vehicle. So that, in the beginning, writing, like reading, was less a solitary pursuit than an attempt to connect with others. I did not write alone but with another student in my class at school. We would sit together, this friend and I, dreaming up characters and plots, taking turns writing sections of the story, passing the pages back and forth. Our handwriting was the only thing that separated us, the only way to determine which section was whose. I always preferred rainy days to bright ones, so that we could stay indoors at recess, sit in the hallway, and concentrate. But even on nice days I found somewhere to sit, under a tree or on the ledge of the sandbox, with this friend, and sometimes one or two others, to continue the work on our tale. The stories were transparent riffs on what I was reading at the time: families living on prairies, orphaned girls sent off to boarding schools or educated by stern governesses, children with supernatural powers, or the ability to slip through closets into alternate worlds. My reading was my mirror, and my material; I saw no other part of myself.
Jhumpa Lahiri in The New Yorker. Here

Monday, June 06, 2011

Omar Mukhtar Lion of Desert


Omar Mukhtar has been my favourite heroes. I came to know about this brave freedom fighter duritng college days when the film Omar Mukhtar the lion of the desert was released.

At those days I got myself attached with the Islamic movement and totally abstained from watching films. It was an experience - soothing, exhilerating one - to shoo away the influence of films.  Initially I counted the days without films. I counted upto 100. Then it is history. But Omar Mukhtar is the only exception. It was the only film I viewed in Theatre. I remember vividly the day I viewed in erstwhile Alankar Theatre in Madras. Note : I watched it with Brs P M Yousuf Patel, C Muhammad Parvez stalwarts of SIO then. We had gone to see the film after attending a three day training camp!


Then Br T Yousuff Basha gave the book on Omar Mukhtar. It was written by marumalarchi Yousuf Sahib and the narration was gripping. I read it while travelling in a bus. And I read it again and again. Here you can watch it.

India's shame


Some call it India's "gendercide". In the past three decades up to 12 million unborn girls have been deliberately aborted by Indian parents determined to ensure they have a male heir. 

Once, parents desperate for a son achieved the same end by infanticide. But modern medical technology, and the complicity of the medical establishment, has sanitised the process and made it more socially acceptable. The systematic elimination of female foetuses in the world's biggest democracy is widening the gap between girls and boys and storing up social problems for the future. In some towns there is already a shortage of brides and there are fears the growing gender imbalance will worsen attitudes to women.

Latest research shows selective abortion is concentrated in families where the first child has been a girl. Parents welcome a first daughter but want their second child to be a son. In these families the gender ratio for second births fell from 906 girls per 1,000 boys in 1990 to 836 in 2005, implying between 3.1 million and 6 million female foetuses have been aborted in the past decade.

Wealthier, better-educated couples are the worst offenders, the findings show, putting paid to hopes that socio-economic progress would lead to a change in attitude. Although all strata of Indian society share a preference for sons, better-off families have access to and can afford the ultrasound tests to reveal the sex of a foetus.

Couples believe their family is unbalanced without a son who will continue the family name, earn money, look after his relatives and take care of his parents in old age in a country which has no social security system. Importantly, a girl will marry out of her family, taking her dowry with her, while a boy will bring a dowry into the family, a significant economic advantage.
Jeremy Laurance in The Independent. Here

Translate

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...