Peter Walker and Mathew Taylor in The Guardian. HereThe far right is on the rise across Europe as a new generation of young, web-based supporters embrace hardline nationalist and anti-immigrant groups, a study has revealed ahead of a meeting of politicians and academics in Brussels to examine the phenomenon.
Research by the British thinktank Demos for the first time examines attitudes among supporters of the far right online. Using advertisements on Facebook group pages, they persuaded more than 10,000 followers of 14 parties and street organisations in 11 countries to fill in detailed questionnaires.
The study reveals a continent-wide spread of hardline nationalist sentiment among the young, mainly men. Deeply cynical about their own governments and the EU, their generalised fear about the future is focused on cultural identity, with immigration – particularly a perceived spread of Islamic influence – a concern.
"We're at a crossroads in European history," said Emine Bozkurt, a Dutch MEP who heads the anti-racism lobby at the European parliament. "In five years' time we will either see an increase in the forces of hatred and division in society, including ultra-nationalism, xenophobia, Islamophobia and antisemitism, or we will be able to fight this horrific tendency."
The report comes just over three months after Anders Breivik, a supporter of hard right groups, shot dead 69 people at youth camp near Oslo. While he was disowned by the parties, police examination of his contacts highlighted the Europe-wide online discussion of anti-immigrant and nationalist ideas.
Showing posts with label Islamophobia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamophobia. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 08, 2011
Rise of rights: Europe at cross roads
Friday, April 29, 2011
The burqa ban and an increasingly Islamophobic Europe
When British author Rudyard Kipling wrote his famous ballad of East and West he could never have imagined the relevance this theme would have over 120 years later. The opening line “East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet” is much-quoted and yet often misinterpreted.
It is a sad fact that the EU is becoming increasingly Islamophobic and that since 9/11, Europe’s apprehension for its own as well as the worldwide Muslim populations has been surging. Over the past decade there has been a progressively right-wing swing in the European electorate, and it is a trend that is accelerating. The fact that this negative trend seems to be driven by populist politicians makes it even worse, not to mention irresponsible and dangerous. Nowhere is this more true than in some of the larger member states -- France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Denmark -- which all have large Muslim communities. Unlike the US, Europe has failed to embrace multiculturalism, with an ever-widening gap between perception and reality becoming evident. Many believe that Muslims are flooding in, taking jobs and would like to turn Europe into a land ruled by Islamic law. Yet, Muslims represent only 3 percent of the population.
Islamic dress, particularly the burqa, has become a focus for wrenching political disputes. The recent decision by France to ban the burqa is an example of this negative trend.
Amanda Paul in Zaman. More
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Sarkozy's weird idea of banning the veil and some thoughts
A COLUMNIST should never tackle the same topic two weeks in a row, advice masters of the trade. So forgive me for ignoring this counsel and barging in headlong where we have been before — ad nauseam. But I couldn’t help myself when I came across this posting on Arab News online.
Taking part in the raging debate over the ban on the Muslim veil that came into force in Nicolas Sarkozy’s France this week, a reader who identifies herself as “a Muslimah” writes: “Time and time again in ‘free, democratic’ societies women are manipulated and taught to believe that their freedom is directly linked to the removal of their clothing. Such emphasis has never been placed on men though. It’s the removal of women’s clothing and NOT the choice to wear whatever they like that — women are brainwashed into believing — preserves their freedom as is evident from this (French) ban on veil.”
Her whole post deserves to be read by everyone and widely shared. But I have to round it off with her closing lines:
“Yet those supporting the ban would have us believe Muslim women are the ones who are manipulated and suppressed. But it’s hardly surprising to see free societies ban women from covering their bodies. These are the nations in which women are used daily as mere commodities for buying and selling. The lands of the living Barbie dolls, where the daily objectification of women and young girls as sexual playthings has reached the mainstream. The female physique has become public property. Women must be on public display at all times.”
Need I add more? I am yet to come across a more fitting and right on-the-nose take on the issue. Perhaps only a Muslim woman could have spotlighted the absurdity and rank hypocrisy of this whole circus in the continent that takes pride on its image as the land of freedom and civil liberties.
In the land of Magna Carta, no eyebrows are raised if you go around in your birthday suit, go French kissing or get intimate in public. In fact, such actions only prove your liberal ethos and qualification to be part of Western societies. But you are a grave threat to peace and stability of the state the moment you cover your face. How ridiculous can you get?
Do the Europeans even realize the absurdity of their actions? Did President Sarkozy watch the scenes of French cops rounding and rouging up veiled women in nationwide crackdown even as head-to-toe fully clothed Christian nuns watched? This is why I believe this debate has more to do with politics, rather than religion.
This is not about individual freedoms, religious tolerance or Islam’s incompatibility with France or Europe. There are two issues at the heart of this conflict. First is old-fashioned politics. Even as Europe’s politicians, from Belgium to France and from Switzerland to Denmark, trumpet their liberal values and secular democratic credentials, they tap into the deep seated insecurities and paranoia of their Caucasian and Christian European populace for swift electoral gains or power.
So Sarkozy, hoping of re-election, not just comes up with this weird idea of banning the veil and punishing those refusing to take off the piece of cloth that is part of their religious beliefs, he presides over a national debate as to why Muslims cannot be part of the liberal and democratic French society.
His Interior Minister Claude Guéant, under fire for terming French campaign against Libya’s Qaddafi a new crusade, has gone to the extent of saying the problem is with “the growing numbers of Muslim population.”
In the Alpine paradise of Switzerland they have outlawed mosque minarets because they do not blend in a European skyline.
In Denmark, Holland and other Scandinavian countries, they have found another way of rejecting the Muslims — by targeting their sacred icons and beliefs, from caricaturing the Prophet (peace be upon him) to attacking the Qur’an in films and art.
Paradoxically, all this is done in the name of Europe’s liberal ethos and tolerance. So even as they pontificate to us about an individual’s freedom to say and do what he or she wants, they are targeting the very same freedom by forcing Muslim woman to take off the veil.
The second – and real — issue at the heart of this conflict is the white, predominantly Christian West’s deepening fear psychosis about Islam and the Muslims eventually running over and taking over the West and annihilating their entire civilization. Looked at it from their perspective, you would understand their insecurity and growing paranoia.
ON the one hand, their numbers are diminishing and not just in Europe. The continent that ruled the world for nearly four centuries is shrinking and aging fast. It is yet to recover from the destruction and depletion of its numbers during the World War I and II. To maintain its ascendancy, it needs a young population and lots of it. It’s precisely for this reason it has had to willy-nilly take in the growing numbers of immigrants from around the world, especially from those lands that it not long ago ruled. The new arrivals are heading to the West not merely because it offers greater economic opportunities and freedom, many of them are victims of the long years of colonization of Asia and Africa by European powers.
On the other hand, notwithstanding these compulsions, the West finds it difficult to reconcile itself to the reality of its changing demographic profile and what it sees as a cultural and intellectual invasion, especially from Islam and Muslims.
European pundits have long talked about Europe turning into Eurabia and London into Londonistan. While in the past few decades millions from Arab and Muslim lands have migrated to the West in search of a better life, Muslim ranks in the West have been expanding also because more and more white Europeans and Americans are turning to Islam for guidance and inspiration.
With excessive materialism and moral decay destroying family unit and society as a whole, more and more people are finding spiritual solace in Islam. So if the religion is the fastest growing in the world today despite a relentless global crusade against its followers, you know where to look for answers.
We need to look at this wave of Islamophobia, from burning the Qur’an to banning the veil, from this perspective. More important, Muslims must desist from responding to these bouts of bigotry with bigotry. Hatred cannot fight hatred. Only love and understanding can. As the Qur’an suggests, when faced with adversity, we must fight it with something that is better.
The current wave of Islamophobia is largely fueled by ignorance, myths and insecurities. You can counter it by promoting knowledge and true understanding of the faith that came not just for the Arabs but whole of mankind. Not an easy task by any means. We have no other choice though.
Aijaz Zaka Syed in Arab News. More Here.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Tahrir Square, rise of Islamists and Islamophobia!
ARE Muslims taking over the world, or at a minimum, transforming Europe into Eurabia? Whatever your hopes or fears for the future of the world’s religions, a report published this week has plenty to stoke them. “The Future of the Global Muslim Population”, produced by the Pew Research Centre, a non-profit outfit based in Washington, DC, reckons Muslim numbers will soar from 1.6 billion in 2010 to 2.2 billion by 2030. In other words, from 23.4% to 26.4% of the global total.
The total Muslim share of Europe’s population is predicted to grow from 6% now to 8% in 2030: hardly the stuff of nightmares. But amid that are some sharp rises. The report assumes Britain has 2.9m Muslims now (far higher than the usual estimates, which suggest 2.4m at most), rising to 5.6m by 2030. As poor migrants start families in Spain and Italy, numbers there will rocket; in France and Germany, where some Muslims are middle-class, rises will be more modest—though from a higher base. Russia’s Muslims will increase to 14.4% or 18.6m, up from 11.7% now (partly because non-Muslims are declining). The report takes a cautious baseline of 2.6m American Muslims in 2010, but predicts the number will surge by 2030 to 6.2m, or 1.7% of the population—about the same size as Jews or Episcopalians. In Canada the Muslim share will surge from 2.8% to 6.6%.
How will liberal democracies accommodate such variety? The clarity of a written constitution may give America an advantage over many European countries, where unwritten custom has more sway. Jonathan Laurence, an Islam-watcher and professor at Boston College, thinks Europe could rise to the challenge, but failure is also easy to imagine. Europe’s Muslims should, by 2030, have become articulate and effective political bargainers.
From a report in The Economist. More Here.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
பயணங்கள் முடிவதில்லை: மருதன்
பயணம் திரைப்படம் போதிக்கும் நீதி, பின்வருமாறு.
இஸ்லாமியர்கள் எனப்படுபவர்கள்:-
1) தீவிரவாதிகள்.
2) குரூரமானவர்கள்.
3) வன்முறையில் அழுத்தமான நம்பிக்கை கொண்டவர்கள்.
4) பாகிஸ்தானைத் தங்கள் தாய்நாடாகக் கருதுபவர்கள்.
5) இந்தியா தங்களை தொடர்ந்து வஞ்சித்து வருகிறது என்று நம்புபவர்கள்.
6) கடத்தல்காரர்கள், கொலைக்கு அஞ்சாதவர்கள்.
7) இஸ்லாமியர்களுக்கே எதிரானவர்கள்.
8) புனித நூலில் அல்ல, புனிதப் போர்களில் நம்பிக்கை கொண்டவர்கள்.
9) இந்தியாவை அழிக்க, சதாசர்வகாலமும் திட்டமிட்டு வருபவர்கள்.
சரி, இவர்களை என்ன செய்யலாம்? அதற்கும் படத்தில் சுலபத் தீர்வுகள் உள்ளன.
1) இவர்களிடம் இரக்கம் காட்டிப் பயனில்லை.
2) தீவிரவாதி என்று தெரியவந்தால் போதும், சுட்டுவிடலாம்.
3) கமாண்டோ படைகளுக்கு கூடுதல் அதிகாரம் தரவேண்டும்.
4) தேசத்தைத் துண்டாடும், ஊறு விளைவிக்கும் சக்திகளை உடனடியாக அகற்றவேண்டும். இது அரசாங்கத்தின் கடமை.
5) பத்திரிகை, தொலைக்காட்சி உள்ளிட்ட ஊடகங்கள் அரசாங்கத்துடன் ஒத்துழைக்கவேண்டும். அரசையும் தேச ஒற்றுமையையும் பலவீனப்படுத்தும் செய்திகளை இவர்கள் வெளியிடக்கூடாது. ('அரசாங்கத்துக்காக இல்லாவிட்டாலும், நம் நாட்டுக்காக' என்கிறார் கமாண்டோ நாகார்ஜுனா).
சென்னையில் இருந்து புது தில்லி செல்லும் ஒரு விமானத்தைத் தீவிரவாதிகள் (என்றால், இஸ்லாமியர்கள்) கடத்துகிறார்கள். தலைவர் யூசுஃப் கானை விடுதலை செய் என்பது அவர்கள் முதல் கோரிக்கை. நூறு கோடி ரூபாய் பணம் என்பது இரண்டாவது கோரிக்கை. பிறகு, எங்களுக்குப் பணம் வேண்டாம் அது ஹராம் என்று மறுத்துவிட்டு, தங்கள் தலைவரை மட்டும் கோருகிறது கடத்தல் கும்பல். பணம் ஹராம். ஆனால், கொலை, சாதாரணமாம்.
சிக்கிக்கொண்டிருக்கும் பயணிகளை மீட்டு, கடத்தல்காரர்களை எப்படி இந்திய கமாண்டோ முறியடிக்கிறது என்பது மிச்சக் கதை. உள்துறைச் செயலராக பிரகாஷ் ராஜ். கமாண்டோவாக நாகார்ஜுனா. தேசப்புற்று, ச்சே தேசப்பற்று நோயால் நாடி, நரம்புகள் வீங்கி, துடித்து, ஆர்ப்பரித்து எழும் மெய்யான இந்திய வீரர். அதி பயங்கர அணு ஆயுதத் தயாரிப்பில் ஈடுபடும் தீவிரவாதியான யூசுஃப் கானின் குழுவினரை லடாக்கில் என்கவுண்டர் பண்ணிவிட்டு, யூசுஃபை மட்டும் கைது செய்து செய்த மாவீரர் இவர். இத்தனை கஷ்டப்பட்டு சிறை பிடித்தவரை சும்மா விட்டுவிடமுடியுமா? எனவே, நாகார்ஜுனா கடத்தல்காரர்களை அழித்து, பயணிகளை மீட்கிறார்.
இந்தப் படத்தில் ஓர் அக்கிரகார அம்மாஞ்சி வருகிறார். அவருடைய குணாம்சங்கள் கீழ்வருமாறு.
1) வைதீகப் பற்று மிக்கவன்.
2) பழி, பாவம் அறியாதவன்.
3) பாதகச் செயல்களைக் கேள்வியுற்றாலே நடுநடுங்கும் அளவுக்கு நேர்மையானவன்.
4) அசடு.
5) அப்பாவி.
இதே படத்தில் ஒரு பாதிரியாரும் இடம்பெறுகிறார்.
1) இறை ஊழியத்துக்காகத் தன் வாழ்நாளை அர்ப்பணித்துக்கொண்டவர்.
2) ஒரு கன்னத்தில் அறைந்தால், மறு கன்னத்தைக் காட்டக்கூடியவர்.
3) மற்றவர்களுக்காக உயிர் தியாகம் செய்ய முன்வருபவர்.
4) தன் எதிரிகளுக்கும் கருணையைப் பரிசாகத் தருபவர்.
முற்போக்காளர் என்று அறியப்படுபவர் ஒருவரும் இப்படத்தில் வருகிறார். அவர் இயல்புகள்.
1) காந்தி, கார்ல் மார்க்ஸ் இருவரையும் வாசித்தவர். இருவராலும் (அதெப்படி?) ஈர்க்கப்பட்டவர்.
2) பொலிவியா குறித்தும் நாத்திகம் குறித்தும் சில வரிகள் பேசுகிறார்.
3) 'ஹைதரபாத் போய் பார், அங்கே முஸ்லிம்கள் எவ்வளவு அழகாக வாழ்கிறார்கள். நீங்கள் மட்டும் ஏன் இப்படி?' என்று கடத்தல்காரரிடம் கேள்வி கேட்கிறார்.
4) குண்டடிப்பட்டுச் சாகிறார்.
காலம் காலமாக தமிழ் சினிமா சென்றுகொண்டிருக்கும் அதே பாதையில் மற்றுமொரு அப்பட்டமான Stereotype பயணம். ஓர் இஸ்லாமியரை அப்பாவியாகவும், ஒரு பிராமணரை தீவிரவாதியாகவும், ஒரு முற்போக்காளரை நிஜமான முற்போக்காளராகவும் எப்போது தமிழ் சினிமா காட்டப்போகிறது?
ஏற்கெனவே பொதுப்புத்தியில் பரவிக்கிடக்கும் இஸ்லாமிய எதிர்ப்பு கருத்தாக்கங்ளை மீண்டும் ஒருமுறை வலுப்படுத்தியிருக்கிறது பயணம்.பயணங்கள் முடிவதில்லை.
பயணம் படம் பற்றிய மருதனின் விமர்சனத்திலிருந்து More Here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




