Saturday, October 30, 2010

Arundhati Roy is the creation of the system

It is futile to denude metaphors to their bare meanings, but in this case it might be useful to try. We know very little about conscience but what we do know is that there is an unattainable moral superiority about it, and that it usually transmits unsolicited advice, which is the opposite of what the mind really wants to do. But at the same time, it is fundamentally a creation of the mind, a creation that is meant to come in conflict with its maker. That is Roy. She is the creation of the very system that she aspires to bring down.

A weak economy and an immature democracy would systematically empower a particular class of people, first by giving them a social headstart through the early landed wealth of their ancestors, then by letting them cash their social gains for even greater affluence and influence. Some of them would then begin to challenge the injustices of the very system that made their righteous ire possible. A reason why Open receives so many story pitches from foreign-returned journalism students who want to do only bleeding-heart stories—the trauma of child labour, the plight of village women and the agony of stray dogs. And Kashmir. It seems every loaded intern wants to do an anti-Indian Government Kashmir story (and on the way, liberate Tibetans).

Roy is more talented, genuine and courageous than most people who would get along with her. But the fact remains that she is, more than anything, an anomaly that completes the system, a system that not only made her but also needs her for its own balance and survival. If this part is somewhat familiar, it is because it is derived from The Matrix trilogy.

There is a scene in The Matrix Reloaded where I usually imagine Arundhati Roy as Neo, the hero of the tale. It is the scene where Neo meets The Architect, the creator of the Matrix, the computer programme that has replaced the real world and its real life. In this scene, Neo wants to know, “Why am I here?” The Architect, who looks like Vint Cerf, one of the fathers of the internet, gives a tangential answer, “You are the eventuality of an anomaly, which despite my sincerest efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. While it remains a burden assiduously avoided, it is not unexpected, and thus not beyond a measure of control, which has led you, inexorably, here.”

That Roy is here as the inevitable consequence of the very system she wants to dismantle, that she is an expected anomaly, becomes more evident in her other battle—against globalisation and a potent version of capitalism. The huge advance for her debut novel that brought the first tremors of critical and commercial interest in her work, the rise of the reading middle class, the liberal movement, the many forms of media that conveyed her thoughts to millions, the international interest in Indian writers, and her own favourite Mac on which she writes her essays against capitalism, are all consequences of capitalism’s ways. But then capitalism also needs the imagination of soul, self-loathing, the delusion of introspection, so that people are not completely repulsed by their own greed. As The Architect would have said, “Ergo, Arundhati Roy.”

From Manu Joseph's view in Tehelka. More Here.


Umair said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Umair said...

Dear Azeez bhai

The article really reflects an important aspect of the system and the society. The topic which is discussed here has a deep meaning and might not be understood completely by a person like me. The fire will come only when all the necessities for it like the air and fuel is in place with the right combination of both. People like this will rise in each era of the society because of the reason I am citing in the sentence that follows. The intention of a person might not be 'The Ultimate Success' of Hereafter but there is always a clash inside a person having a living heart because those are the very fundamentals on which man was created by God, that is, he has the capability to judge between justice and injustice but the courage to adopt that is the one which brings the change both inside a human and outside. I agree that people like Arundhati are created by the system but that is how this system works. But no doubt 'The Reality' is the one and only sent by 'The Almighty'. Also, about the authors thought on capitalism. The Capitalism which we know in today's world is wrong but if capital is collected and utilized in an ethical manner it is a boon for society and even the quest for acquiring that is also not harmful if done in some boundaries.
The President of the biggest capitalist country while on his tour to India and replying to a question by a student on 'Materialism vs Morals' said that , "I don't want any young person to be dismissive of a healthy materialism because in a country like India, there are still lot of people trapped in poverty and you should try to lift folks out of poverty. Companies and businesses have huge role in making that happen. Now, having said that, if all you are thinking about material wealth, then that shows poverty of ambition". Hope that some day they will follow what they say but the idea is healthy capitalism [not materialism] can be a benefit for the society


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...